Michigan’s First Commercial Scale Wind Farm – Pigeon, MI

February 21st, 2010 at 8:02 am by Bethany No comments »

IMG00042 

 

The other day I was driving in the “thumb” of Michigan through Pigeon, MI and I was surprised to see windmills.  As I drove, I watched the hypnotic movement of these windmills in amazement.  I stopped near one set of windmills to take the picture shown above.  I listened to see if I could hear the windmill making a noise but I heard nothing. 

This windfarm is made up of 32 windmills sitting on 3,200 acres.  This project represents a $97 million dollar investment that produces 52.8 megawatts of electricity.  On average, 1 megawatt will supply power for 500 homes.  The wind farm is owned by Harvest Wind Farm who sells power to Wolverine Power Cooperative and 15,000 homes are powered. 

In 2009, wind power grew by 31% worldwide.  I am ready for wind power in Southeastern Michigan.

Popularity: 4%

UN Reports – Top Companies are Largest Pollutors

February 20th, 2010 at 7:48 am by Bethany No comments »

mercurynz0

A United Nations Report release on Feb 19th found the top 3,000 companies cause $2.2 trillion dollars in environmental damage every year. 

The report is being compiled by the United Kingdom-based environmental consulting firm Trucost, and is based on eight years of research on large companies.  One of the challenges Trucost faced was in assessing a company’s environmental impact through the entire supply chain, assessing the impact of not only a company, but also their suppliers, often located in countries where there are fewer regulations and records.

The report was based on green house gas emissions, local pollutions, particulate emissions, and use of timber and water.  The names of companies were not released but the report did say the include all the 500 companies on the Standards and Poor List.

Interestingly these same companies can be found on The 2009 List of Green Rankings

Popularity: 1%

Canadian Gov’t Is Expected to Approve Genetically Modified Pigs

February 20th, 2010 at 6:47 am by Bethany 1 comment »

gm-food-moratorium

Genetically modified pigs upon approval will enter Canadian food supply.  These pigs were modified to produce less 30-65% less phosphorus in their excrement.  While, I agree that pig waste is a major environmental problem, there are less drastic ways of dealing with the problem. 

I would have suggested less consumption of pigs by Canadian citizens to reduce the environmental impacts of pig farming.  Another option is to regulate waste management at these farms, such as imposing hazardous waste restrictions on the manure.  Finally, using biomass energy to convert manure to energy, thus eliminating the leaching of phosphorus from the pig waste  into streams and reducing emissions of ammonia.   

All genetically modified (GM) crops available on the international market today have been designed using one of three basic traits: resistance to insect damage; resistance to viral infections; and tolerance towards certain herbicides. All the genes used to modify crops are derived from microorganisms.  GM food was first put on the market in the early 1990s.

Steven Liss, Associate Vice-President for research at the University of Guelph told that an application had been sent to the U. S. Food and Drug Administration and added that the University of Guelph will continue to breed the animals under strict confinement and control measures.

While confinment and control measures are prudent steps in preventing the release of genetically modified genes into the wild, nothing is perfectally secure.

The use of Enviropigs, genetically modified pigs, will be announced by the Canadian Government.

EnvironmentCanada will announce approval of the strain known as Enviropigs, after being approved by Health Canada, before the pigs enter the food market.

More information about the pros and cons of genetically modified food can be found at the bottom of this article. 

Popularity: 6%

The State of Florida Considers a Ban on Plastic Bags

February 19th, 2010 at 3:36 pm by Bethany No comments »

plastic-bags

Paper or Plastic?  How about neither.  Reusable bags would be the more environmentally friendly way to go. 

Florida legislature is considering options on how to deal with plastic bag waste from fees to bans on plastic bags. 

The agency issued a draft report in October that recommended a graduated fee for plastic and paper bags followed eventually by a ban. But it rescinded the draft and the final version issued earlier this month contains a distinctly softer tone — and no recommendations.

Is plastic bag waste really a problem?

A 2003 study found U.S. residents used 90 billion retail bags that year. In Florida, only 12 percent of plastic bags and 37 percent of paper bags are reused or recycled, according to state figures. Across the nation, about 30 states have enacted or considered bag regulations.

I would like to see every state charge customers for not recycling their waste.  It is so easy to recycle and it is the environmentally responsible thing to do.  Plastic bags can go in the recycling bin with your other recyclable materials. 

Popularity: 5%

Ohio State University Becomes on of the Largest Purchasers of Green Power

February 19th, 2010 at 3:13 pm by Bethany No comments »

osu-autumn

Ohio State purchases 18 Million kilowatt-hours or 3% of its power from green energy sources, such as solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, biogas and low-impact hydropower.  This is equivalent of removing 2,000 passenger vehicles a year from the road.

Popularity: 1%

A Compliant Filed with USDA on Organic Beauty Products

February 12th, 2010 at 7:05 pm by Bethany No comments »

USDAOrganicLogo

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has received a complaint from Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps, Intelligent Nutrients, Organic Essence, and the Organic Consumers Association regarding a few companies who have claimed they are organic but do not use any certified organic products in their formulation. 

The companies named in the complaint are:

  1. Hain Celestial Group’s Jasön Pure Natural and Organic
  2. Avalon Organic Brands
  3. Kiss My Face Corp
  4. Levlad LLC Nature’s Gate Organics
  5. YSL Beauté Inc.’s Stella McCartney Care 100% Organic Active Ingredients
  6. Organic Wear
  7. Physicians’ Formula Holdings

As I type this, I am suspiciously eyeing my Avalon Organics’ Lemon Hand & Body Lotion.  Hopefully, this compliant will result in responsible, truthful organic labelling.

Popularity: 3%

Phthalate Exposure Linked to Attention Deficit Disorder in Children

January 31st, 2010 at 7:14 am by Bethany 1 comment »

cosmetics

Phthalatesare primarly used as plasticizers, chemicals added to plastics to increase their flexibility, transparency, durability and longevity.  They are used in a wide variety of products including cosmetics and almost every brand of perfume. 

Chemical Structure of Phthalates

Chemical Structure of Phthalates

A study in the Environmental Health Prospectivesjournal found a link between the amount of phthalate exposure and Attention Deficit Disorder.  In layman’s terms, more phthalates = more behavioral problems.

Children exposed in the womb to chemicals in cosmetics and fragrances are more likely to develop behavioral problems commonly found in children with attention deficit disorders, according to a study of New York City school-age children published Thursday.  Scientists at Mount Sinai School of Medicine reported that mothers who had high levels of phthalates during their pregnancies were more likely to have children with poorer scores in the areas of attention, aggression and conduct.

Where can you find phthalate free products?

According to Big Green Purse the following cosmetic companies sell phthalate free products:

Burt’s Bees– Lip balms, glosses, sticks and shimmers; face cleansers, toners, complexion bars, moisturizers, eye crèmes and exfoliating scrubs; shampoos and conditioners; toothpaste and peppermint breath drops; eye make-up and face powder; various “Baby Bee” products and a growing list of “Men’s Grooming” choices. Increasingly available in mainstream grocery stores, drugstores, and pharmacies.
Eco Bella Organics – Includes perfumes, bath and body products, cosmetics, and skin and hair care products. Often available in organic and natural foods stores and food co-ops.
Aubrey Organics – Products are made primarily with herbals, essential oils and vitamins. Includes baby care, bath products, hair care and color, hand and body lotions, makeup, skin care, soaps, toiletries, sun protection, and hair and skin essentials for men. Often available in organic and natural foods stores and food co-ops.
Tom’s of Maine – Offers 90 oral and body care products, sold at 40,000 retail outlets in the U.S. and around the world. Products include toothpaste, deodorant, mouthwash, soap, shaving cream, and dental floss.
Honeybee Gardens – In addition to a variety of lipsticks, powders, eyeliner, eye shadow, hair spray, shampoo, and conditioner, Honey Bee manufactures water-based nail polish, including one brand that can peel off without need of nail polish remover.

 Phthalates are also present in toys and other plastic products. 

Avoid PVC plastic. Unless made by a U.S. manufacturer who has indicated the product is phthalate-free, avoid soft plastic toys and soft vinyl products with a strong plastic smell such as plastic shower curtains. For information on PVC-free products for the home, office, and building materials, check out the resources available at: http://www.besafenet.com/pvc/documents/PVC-Guide-1.pdf.

Limit your and your children’s exposure to phthalates by considering the chemicals present in products you purchase. 

Popularity: 17%

The Wind Power Potential of U.S. States

January 30th, 2010 at 9:18 am by Bethany No comments »

wind-farm

The Obama Administration has set the goals of generating 25% of our energy from renewable energy sources.  Currently, wind energy makes up about 1% of of U.S. energy supply, powering 4.5 million homes.  According to the American Wind Energy Association, more than twice the energy generated today could be powered by wind — 10,777 kWh annually. 

Currently, the states with the most wind power installed are not the states with the most wind power potential. 

States with most wind energy installed, by capacity (MW):

1.

Texas

2,768

2.

California

2,361

3.

Iowa

936

4.

Minnesota

895

5.

Washington

818

 

The top 20 States for wind power, as measured by annual energy potential in billions of kWhs, factoring in environmental land use exclusions for wind class of 3 and higher.

  1. North Dakota – 1,21
  2. Texas - 1,190
  3. Kansas – 1.070
  4. South Dakota – 1,030
  5. Montana - 1,020
  6. Nebraska - 868
  7. Wyoming - 747
  8. Oklahoma - 725
  9. Minnesota - 657
  10. Iowa - 551
  11. Colorado – 481
  12. New Mexico – 435
  13. Idaho – 73
  14. Michigan – 65
  15. New York – 62
  16. Illinois – 61
  17. California – 59
  18. Wisconsin – 58
  19. Maine – 56
  20. Missouri – 52

Source: An Assessment of Availability Windy Land Area and Wind Energy Potential in the Contiguous United States, Pacific Northwest Laboratory 1991.

U.S. Department of Energy's United States — 50-Meter Wind Resource Map

U.S. Department of Energy's United States — 50-Meter Wind Resource Map

Click here to zoom in on the above map and click on individual states to view their wind potential.

Some States have set their own renewable energy goals.  With Texas leading the way in wind energy generation, other states are working to catch up.  Michigan has set the goal of 10% of its utility power to come from renewable sources, such as wind, by 2015.  Early this year, DTE Energy signed an agreement with Michigan-based Hertiage Sustainable Energy to construct 7 large scale wind turbines in Cadillac, MI.  The wind turbines will produce enough energy to power 2,000 homes.

Popularity: 4%

Can Coca Cola Make a 100% Plant Based Bottle?

January 30th, 2010 at 5:58 am by Bethany No comments »

coca-cola-PlantBottle

Just in time for the Climate Summit in Denmark, Coke started manufacturing bottles made with 30% plant material. 

The new plant-based bottle developed by Coke is composed of 70% petroleum-based and 30% sugar-cane-based materials.  The cane is crushed and mashed to produce juice, which is then fermented and distilled, producing ethanol.  That ethanol is then converted through a series of chemical processes such as oxidation to a mono-ethylene glycol—a component normally derived from petroleum for use in plastic bottles.  The MEG is then mixed with terephthalic acid to create PET plastic.

These efforts by Coca Cola have been in response to its attacks by environmentalists over its plastic bottles.  According to the Pacific Institute, a California based environmental think tank, the production of plastic bottles in 2006 took 17 million barrels of oil (excluding the costs of transporting these containers).  The new plant based bottles will lower the manufacture’s carbon footprint by 12-19%. 

But is an all plant based bottle practical?  Coke is trying to make it a reality. 

Plant-based bottles can pose hurdles, beverage-industry experts acknowledge. The bottles often have a shorter shelf life than PET bottles, and they don’t hold carbonation as long, says Wade Groetsch, president of Blue Lake Citrus LLC, a Winter Haven, Fla.-based juice processor, who says he supports Coke’s environmental push.  Mr. Groetsch’s company uses plastic containers that are 100% polylactic acid, derived from corn, for its organic Noble Juices drinks. “It just doesn’t keep the product protected the same way that the current bottles do,” he says. “It’s definitely a tradeoff.”

In 2008, only 27% of PET containers were recycled, according to the National Association of PET Containers Resources. 

Until plastic bottles are 100% environmentally friendly, a better packaging option is aluminium cans, that can be recycled indefinitely.  According to the Aluminum Institute, yearly recycling of aluminium cans exceeds 50%.   If all states had a bottle deposit, then perhaps these recycling numbers would increase to closer to 100%. 

Popularity: 7%

Recovery Act: Competitive Grants for Green Job Training

January 24th, 2010 at 9:31 am by Bethany 1 comment »

green-jobs

On February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) to preserve and create jobs, promote the nation’s economic recovery, and assist those most impacted by the recession. The purpose of these grants is to teach workers the skills required in emerging industries including energy efficiency and renewable energy.

These grants are designed to achieve the following goals:  

  • Create an integrated system of education, training and supportive services that promotes skill attainment and career pathway development for low-income, low- skilled workers leading to employment in green industries.
  • Support states in implementing a statewide energy sector strategy including governors’overall workforce visions, state energy policies and training activities that lead to employment in targeted industry sectors.
  • Build and strengthen partnerships dedicated to building a skilled clean energy workforce.
  • Develop new partnerships with other agencies receiving Recovery Act funds to support strategic planning and implementation efforts.

Through the grant awards announced today, program participants will receive the technical and occupational skills necessary to obtain industry recognized credentials.  See the bottom of the article for more information by State regarding the amount of people who will be training, the counties covered, and  who to contact for training information.  Also, to find out more about job training opportunities available through the Department of Labor, call the National Contact Center’s toll-free helpline at:866-4-USA-DOL (487-2365) or TTY877-889-5627.

Popularity: 2%