Archive for the ‘Environmental News’ category

Washington D.C.’s Environmental Film Festival from March 16th – 28th

March 14th, 2010

env fim festival

The 18th Annual Environmenal Film Festivalis featuring 155 films from 30 different countries and the filmmakers will be on site to discuss their films.  This year’s theme is food and the environment.  Many screenings are free, so check the website link below for more details.

Some of the films include American Eagle about the recovery of bald eagles in America and Behold the Earth which explores America’s divorce from nature and reliance on spending time indoors with virtual amusements.  For a complete list of the films, click here

The 2010 Festival explores the vital connections between food and the environment. What we eat is essential to our health and wellbeing; how food is produced and transported to our tables affects the condition of our planet. Starting from the ground up, Dirt! The Movie and Soil in Good Heartfocus on earth’s most underrated source of fertility and its key role in creating nourishing food. Our pre-Festival screening for D.C. public and charter school students, What’s On Your Plate? investigates the sources of our food while Lunch looks specifically at school food programs. Food Fight traces the birth of the country’s sustainable organic food movement in California during the 1960s, led by Alice Waters. Fresh and Ingredients celebrate today’s farmers, chefs and business people who are creating a new food culture in America. Terra Madre highlights the contributions of Italy’s Slow Food movement and HomeGrown spotlights an urban family farm in Pasadena, California. Nora!profiles Washington restaurateur, Nora Pouillon, founder of the nation’s first certified organic restaurant.

Sounds like any amazing event, If I was in D.C. I would have to take a week off of work and see these films.  Perhaps, I will have to plan a trip next year. 

Popularity: 3%

EPA Proposes a $475 Million Dollar Restoration Plan

March 6th, 2010

noaa-great-lakes-ge

The $475 Million dollar project includes cleanup of water and beaches, wetland restoration, and fighting invasive species such as Asian carp. 

The plan calls itself light on study and heavy on action, seeking to heal the Great Lakes ecosystem from “150 years of abuse” and to ensure that “fish are safe to eat; the water is safe to drink; the beaches and waters are safe for swimming, surfing, boating and recreating; native species and habitats are protected and thriving; no community suffers disproportionately from the impacts of pollution; and the Great Lakes are a healthy place for people and wildlife to live.”

The plan is to cut invasive species and increase detection of new threats.

The plan also seeks to cut damaging runoff from farms, cities and suburbs into Great Lakes watersheds, which supply municipal drinking water and animal habitat, and to reduce beach pollution so recreation areas can stay open longer during the year. It includes the first complete assessment of the lakes’ entire 530,000-acre coastal wetland, and a goal of restoring nearly 100,000 acres of wetlands and other habitat areas by 2014.

Several governors from Great Lakes states say the plan will boost their environmental quality — and help energize a multibillion-dollar regional economy reliant on shipping, fishing and tourism.

Popularity: 5%

UN Reports – Top Companies are Largest Pollutors

February 20th, 2010

mercurynz0

A United Nations Report release on Feb 19th found the top 3,000 companies cause $2.2 trillion dollars in environmental damage every year. 

The report is being compiled by the United Kingdom-based environmental consulting firm Trucost, and is based on eight years of research on large companies.  One of the challenges Trucost faced was in assessing a company’s environmental impact through the entire supply chain, assessing the impact of not only a company, but also their suppliers, often located in countries where there are fewer regulations and records.

The report was based on green house gas emissions, local pollutions, particulate emissions, and use of timber and water.  The names of companies were not released but the report did say the include all the 500 companies on the Standards and Poor List.

Interestingly these same companies can be found on The 2009 List of Green Rankings

Popularity: 1%

President Obama Surpasses Teddy Roosevelt for the Best First Year for The Environment

January 24th, 2010

environmental-progress

With the economy taking center stage in Obama’s administration, his advances in environmental protection have gone unnoticed. 

Mercury News reported on the President’s advances on the environment during his first term.   

  • Increased gas mileage standards for cars and light trucks 40 percent, from today’s 25 mpg to 35 mpg by 2016. The announcement in May came as part of Washington’s bailout of Detroit. 
  • Blocked Bush administration rules to open the California coast and 77 federal sites near Utah’s Arches and Canyonlands national parks to new oil and gas drilling.
  • Begun a process in December in which the Environmental Protection Agency will, for the first time, restrict the amount of greenhouse gases industry can release. 
  • Signed a bill in March establishing 2.1 million new acres of federally protected wilderness, the largest wilderness bill since President Bill Clinton signed the Desert Protection Act in 1994. The bill bans logging, mining and road-building on federal forests and deserts in nine states, including portions of Joshua Tree and Sequoia national parks and ancient bristlecone pine forests in the eastern Sierra.
  • Announced tougher new national smog standards from the EPA this month.  
  • Reversed Bush administration rules allowing more snowmobiles in Yellowstone and fewer federal agency reviews of endangered species.
  • Issued EPA rules requiring large U.S. ships to cut soot emissions by 85 percent.
  • Signed a stimulus package that included more than $50 billion in funding and tax credits for renewable energy projects. It includes billions to weatherize federal buildings, provide grants to companies building solar and wind farms and fund research on biofuels and other technologies.

Environmental groups have not gotten everything that they wanted from President Obama.  

Environmental groups have grumbled that Obama upheld Bush rules to remove gray wolves from the endangered species list in the upper Midwest, Idaho and Montana. He also has not moved as fast as they would like to stop a type of coal mining in West Virginia known as “mountain top removal.”

Most of the changes have come through executive branch rules, rather than laws passed by Congress. As a result, they could be overturned by future presidents.

For the sake of the Environment, lets hope the next President is an environmentalist.

Popularity: 4%

CNN’s Top Environmental Moments of the Last Decade

December 28th, 2009

environmental-events-calendar-2008

The environmental movement has made great strides in recent years with more that just scientists taking part in the environmental movement.

CNN published a list of the top 10 Environmental Moments of 1999-2009:

  1. Toyota Prius became the first mass-produced hybrid with 1 million sold worldwide.
  2. The 15th U.N. Summit on climate change took place in Copenhagen, Denmark.  Read more.
  3. Al Gore produced An Inconvenient Truth and won the Nobel Peace Prize
  4. Compact Fluorescent Bulbs(CFCs) helped save consumers money and reduced our energy usage worldwide.
  5. A decade of extreme weather – 2005 Hurricane Katrina, 2003 Hurricanes in Haiti, 2003 Heat wave in Europe, past decade was the hottest on record, 2008 California had 2,780 individual fires affecting large portions of forests and chaparral.
  6. Green vocabulary grew with the addition of carbon footprint, carbon neutral, greenwashing.
  7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported that it was “very likely” that climate change was caused by human activity.
  8. 10 Years of Growth in Renewable Energy – 2008 global power capacity from renewable energy reached 280,000 MW — 3 times more than US nuclear power plants produce.  In 2008, China’s wind power doubled for the 4th year.  Solar energy saw a 20% increased efficiency and ultra-thin solar panels.
  9. 2006 British Economist Sir Nicholas Stern published a 700 page report The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, which discussed the effect of global warming on the world economy. 
  10. Carbon Trading or Cap and Trade became a debated policy. 

Popularity: 5%

12/22/09 EPA Finalizes Stringent Emission Regulations for Ocean Vessels

December 26th, 2009

 large-cargo-ship-pollution-smoke

The EPA has been working to address emissions emitted from ocean vessels.   The goals are to improve air quality and protect human health. 

There are two types of diesel engines used on ocean-going vessels: main propulsion and auxiliary engines.  The main propulsion engines on most ocean-going vessels are very large “Category 3″ marine diesel engines (those with per-cylinder displacement at or above 30 liters).  Auxiliary engines on ocean-going vessels typically range in size from small portable generators to locomotive-size engines with power of 4,000 kilowatts or more. Auxiliary engines on U.S.-flagged ocean-going vessels are subject to EPA’s marine diesel engine standards for engines with per-cylinder displacement up to 30 liters per cylinder.

The regulations set limits on ozone depleting substances such as sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide. 

The emission standards apply in two stages: near-term standards for newly-built engines will apply beginning in 2011, and long-term standards requiring an 80 percent reduction in nitrogen dioxides (NOx) will begin in 2016.

Decreased air quality causes respiratory problems for humans including lung disease and decreased lung function in children.

EPA estimates that in 2030, this effort will prevent between 12,000 and 31,000 premature deaths and 1.4 million work days lost.  The estimated annual health benefits in 2030 as a result of reduced air pollution are valued between $110 and $270 billion, which is up to nearly 90 times the projected cost of $3.1 billion to achieve those results.

There are a few provisions regarding the Great Lakes and the Saint Lawrence Seaway.

First, vessels may now use other methods to achieve sulfur dioxide emissions reductions equivalent to those obtained by the use of lower sulfur fuel.   Second, a fuel availability relief provision has been added for use only by vessels with diesel engines operating on the Great Lakes and Saint Lawrence Seaway.  This provision allows operators to buy the lowest sulfur marine residual fuel available if fuel that meets the near-term 1.0 percent (10,000 ppm) fuel sulfur standard is not available.  Furthermore, we are finalizing an economic hardship relief provision for vessels with diesel engines operating on the Great Lakes and Saint Lawrence Seaway.  This option provides temporary relief from the 2015 ECA-level fuel sulfur standards upon demonstration that the burden of compliance costs would cause serious economic hardship.  Finally, reflecting technical challenges to the use of lower sulfur fuels in steamships, a corresponding potential for reduced safety and a clear directive from the Congress, we are excluding from this final action the application of the ECA-level fuel sulfur standards in MARPOL Annex VI to existing steamships operating on the Great Lakes and Saint Lawrence Seaway.

The EPA’s intent was to reduced air emissions without compromising safety or the maritime economy.  This is a step forward in protecting thousands of miles of US and Canadian costal waterways, including the Great Lakes.  

Popularity: 8%

Are Synthetic Trees the Answer to Decreasing Carbon Dioxide Levels?

December 26th, 2009
Synthetic Tree Design

Synthetic Tree Design

Dr. Klaus Lackner a Columbia University physicist believes the synthetic tree could do the job of a real tree.   

“It looks like a goal post with Venetian blinds,” said the Columbia University physicist, referring to his sketch at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Denver, Colorado.  He predicts that one synthetic tree could remove 90,000 tonnes of CO2 in a year – the emissions equivalent of 15,000 cars. 

The synthetic tree acts as a filter and captures emissions from the wind.  

An absorbent coating, such as limewater, on its slats or “leaves” would seize carbon dioxide and retain the carbon.  “We have to keep the absorbent surfaces refreshed because they will very rapidly fill up with carbon dioxide,” he said. If an alkaline solution such as limewater were used, the resulting coat of limestone would need to be removed.

The technology is not perfected yet.

There are still problems with the technology; the absorbent material would need to be recycled.  But after years of research, Lackner told CNN he and his colleagues have developed a sorbent that is “close to the ideal,” in that it uses a relatively small amount of energy to release the CO2 and is not prohibitively expensive.

The tree captures carbon dioxide 1000 times faster than a real tree. 

Dr. Lackner estimated that 250,000 synthetic trees worldwide would be needed to soak up the 22 billion tonnes of CO2 produced annually.

Perhaps, this is a short term answer to reducing CO2 in the atmosphere.  The technology is expensive, about the cost of a car, but so is not having a habitable planet.

Popularity: 3%

Reduce the Amount of Food Wasted – And Help Prevent Global Warming

December 26th, 2009
Compost Cycle

Compost Cycle

When most people thinking of global warming they worry about the levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, but a more important green house gas is methane.  Methane is 20 times more effective in trapping heat than CO2.  Methane sources are both natural and anthropogenic (human-related).  The EPA estimates that 60% of methane emissions are related to human activities. 

The chart below shows U.S. Methane Emissions by Source.

Source Category 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007
Enteric Fermentation 133.2 143.6 134.4 136.0 138.2 139.0
Landfills 149.2 144.3 122.3 127.8 130.4 132.9
Natural Gas Systems 129.6 132.6 130.8 106.3 104.8 104.7
Coal Mining 84.1 67.1 60.5 57.1 58.4 57.6
Manure Management 30.4 34.5 37.9 41.8 41.9 44.0
Forest Land Remaining Forest Land 4.6 6.1 20.6 14.2 31.3 29.0
Petroleum Systems 33.9 32.0 30.3 28.3 28.3 28.8
Wastewater Treatment 23.5 24.8 25.2 24.3 24.5 24.4
Stationary Combustion 7.4 7.1 6.6 6.7 6.3 6.6
Rice Cultivation 7.1 7.6 7.5 6.8 5.9 6.2
Abandoned Underground Coal Mines 6.0 8.2 7.4 5.6 5.5 5.7
Mobile Combustion 4.7 4.3 3.4 2.5 2.4 2.3
Composting 0.3 0.7 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.7
Petrochemical Production 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0
Field Burning of Agricultural Residue 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9
Iron and Steel Production &
Metallurgical Coke Production
1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7
Ferroalloy Production + + + + + +
Silicon Carbide Production and
Consumption
+ + + + + +
International Bunker Fuels 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total for U.S. 616.6 615.8 591.1 561.7 582.0 585.3

Source: U.S. Emissions Inventory 2009: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

One important way Americans can help curb methane emissions is to reduce the amount of food that ends up in landfills.  Rotting food releases methane gas and only some landfills capture methane for waste to energy uses. 

Around 40 percent of all food manufactured and put on sale in the United States is wasted, and studies show this trend is increasing. Food waste – including waste from farms, manufacturers, retailers and consumers – has risen 50 percent since 1974, reaching about 150 trillion calories per year in 2003.

There are two ways we can help reduce methane emissions. 

  1. Purchase only the food that you need for the week or freeze food before it spoils
  2. Compost food waste

Popularity: 13%

Six Miles of a Chicago Canal Poisoned to Prevent Asian Carp Invasion in the Great Lakes

December 13th, 2009
Asian carp

Asian carp

Last week, State and Federal agencies poisoned six miles of the Chicago Sanitary Ship Canal in an effort to prevent the invasive Asian carp from reaching the Great Lakes.  Lake Michigan has electrical barriers to prevent the carp from entering its waters but maintenance needed to be preformed on the fence.   

In the 1990’s, Asian carp escaped from catfish farms in the south U.S.   They proceeded up the Mississippi River in less then a decade.  The carp have been caught less than 25 miles from the entrance to Lake Michigan.   

Asian carp are a serious threat to the Great Lakes.  They can grow up to 100 lbs and would become a top predator out competing salmon and perch species.   Asian carp are filter feeders and scientists are worried that the carp will deplete the Great Lakes zooplankton species.   Zooplanktons are an important food source for species in the Great Lakes including mussels, larval and adult fish. 

US Army Corps - Electric Barrier

US Army Corps - Electric Barrier

Popularity: 7%

Environmentalists battle Massey Energy to Protect W. Virginia’s Coal River Mountain

December 12th, 2009

coal-river-mountain

The environmental movement against Massey Energy’s project to remove Coal River Mountain’s mountaintop got a boost this week from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.  Kennedy spoke on behalf of the environmental movement to 300 environmentalists and 200 coal miners.

Mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia is a crime, and that if the American people could see it, there would be a revolution.  “We are cutting down the Appalachian Mountains, these historic landscapes where Daniel Boone and Davy Crockett roamed that are so much a part of American culture,” the environmental attorney said at a rally to stop blasting on southern West Virginia’s Coal River Mountain.

The Virginia based Massey Energy has been blasting Coal River Mountain to mine the coal within the mountain.  Massey is the 4th largest coal company in the U.S. and the largest in the Central Appalachian region. 

The environmental groups in opposition are Coal River Mountain Watch and Climate Ground Zero.    Both Organizations want Massey to stick with underground mining and allow the ridges to be turned into a 200-turbine wind farm.

There opposition is based on the destruction from mountaintop removal mining. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is forming a scientific panel to study how mountaintop removal has affected headwater streams and impacted downstream water quality.  The study, announced without fanfare in the Federal Register, will also examine whether coal mining companies are meeting their obligations to restore Appalachian streams where millions of tons of mining debris have been dumped.  Mountaintop coal removal is an environmentally destructive practice in which companies blast off the tops of mountains to get at coal seams below, then dump the debris in Appalachian valleys.  Hundreds of miles of headwaters streams have been buried in mining debris, and the proposed EPA review marks the first time that the agency will undertake a major review of mountaintop mining.

 

Popularity: 3%